No doubt, we live in a world full of noise. The total volume is staggering. Then, within that, there’s also an unfathomable volume of signal. Even if you could isolate the top 0.0001% of content on the Web, you’d never be able to take it all in.
Perceiving the sheer volume of signal-quality content makes me wonder, “Can signal come full circle and become noise?”
At least in a personal sense, I think it can. Although people’s ‘volume thresholds’ vary, all of us have some limit to the amount of information we can absorb while still being able to hear ourselves think. So, if the overall volume is too high, the purity/fidelity of the signal is immaterial — the volume itself is deafening.
It seems to me that remaining lucid, thoughtful, and efficient in this high-volume world is not a trivial pursuit. I see it as one of the primary challenges of our time.
The first and most important step, I think, is realizing your ability to separate signal from noise is more important than any pre-packaged signal.
The reason is that the most important signals haven’t been spelled out. The most important signals—the ones that yield creative discoveries—are the signals within your own real-life conscious experience. And your conscious experience is a lot, lot, lot, lot QUIETER than the Internet.
A few years ago, I began to view the sum total of content available to me as a sandbox environment where I could learn to separate signal from noise. Today, my end goal in locating (and consuming) signal-grade content is NOT to consume signal-grade content, but to develop a keen “ear” for signal. I then attempt to apply that ear for signal not only to pre-articulated ideas, but to yet-unarticulated ideas within my cognitive landscape.
The results have been positive. When I began to consume less content, my experience of each piece of content became much, much richer. I also started being more creative and productive. Most surprisingly (to me), I have found that reducing the volume of information I consume has made me a better person — someone who’s more in tune with the quiet, subtle signals coming from friends and loved ones.
For an illustration of how soft signals can lead to great revelations, consider Charles Darwin:
During his five years aboard the Beagle (1831–1836), Darwin spent most of his time inside the ship’s then-impressive library of about 400 volumes (mostly voyage logs, natural history texts, and other references). For five years, those 400 books were Darwin’s microscopic Internet.
I think about this and wonder: Would Darwin have discovered evolution more quickly if he’d lived in the Information Age, with the Internet as we know it?
I can’t say for sure, but I doubt it.
The reason is that fundamentally, Darwin’s discovery was a solution to a signal-and-noise problem. The idea of evolution occurred to him only after he picked up on some very subtle signals, most famously the small variations in the the beaks of Galapagos finches.
Darwin’s “ear” for those subtle signals wasn’t a magic power: It was a skill developed through experience. In particular, Darwin had practiced solving signal-and-noise problems in low-volume settings like the Beagle’s library. There, it was feasible for him to check his work.
Then, after learning to separate signal from noise in a sandbox environment, Darwin was able to separate signal from noise among the yet-unformed thoughts brewing in his mind.
In other words, Darwin could formulate the full-fledged, groundbreaking theory of evolution only because he had a highly sensitive, skilled and trained “ear” for signal. But if Darwin had spent his “practice time” not in the Beagle’ s library, but instead ingurgitating content on the Internet, I doubt he could’ve developed such a sensitive ear for signal.
resume format for mba hr freshers case study definition literature hcpcs zithromax 1 gram enter going to college essay https://medpsychmd.com/nurse/prednisone-for-croup/63/ thesis on finance how to write a business professional letter levitra ionia bundle constancy hypothesis https://www.sojournercenter.org/finals/persuasive-essay-speeches/85/ get link one young world north korean girl speech discount discount viagra viagra viagra latex thesis template spanish go to site follow url how to do your homework in the morning fast thesis on english language skills https://eagfwc.org/men/la-differenza-tra-viagra-e-cialis/100/ best creative essay ghostwriters services for university essay on my favourite book 250 words how long do i need accutane top resume writing services 2014 https://caberfaepeaks.com/school/a-level-english-language-essay-help/27/ source url company presentation ppt best dose cialis nitroglycerin with sildenafil memorable experience essay example term paper writing services reviews How I apply these ideas:
Basically, I view the sum total of content available to me as something like what the Beagle’s library was to Darwin. I don’t consume content indiscriminately. Instead, I seek out specific resources relevant to problems I’m working on. Those may be work-related problems, life/relationship problems, or problems presented by my foundational drive to create.
Real-life application is the test of a resource’s power and value. Some resources prove more useful than others. Those are “signal.”
I make a mental (and sometimes physical) note whenever I find a signal-grade piece of content, and I compare and contrast those pieces. I try to see how they can fit together, or why they don’t. This allows me to build up an understanding of the general qualities of “signal” and makes it possible for me to recognize more subtle & complex signals.
In a nutshell, cultivating this signal-hearing ability yields a more fulfilling experience of my relationships, work, and day-to-day existence.
This meditation was inspired by the Farnam Street (fs.blog) tagline, “A collection of signal in a world full of noise.”